5 Responsed To This Post
Subsribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL
mygif_alt
Kashyap Says, in 6-14-2005 at 23:44:00 from     

I shall share my thoughts later but want to quickly point out that very often the usability of the CMS system (for example, the content entry screens for the publishers) itself is overlooked - this has contributed to the failure of many a CMS implementation initiative.

Cheers,
Kashyap

Kashyap Kompella
Practice Manager
Wipro Usability & Design

mygif
Benjamin Mestrallet Says, in 6-24-2005 at 17:46:14 from 80.11.113.207    

Check out http://www.exoplatform.com this is a portal that use the concept of dynamic templates which lets the user use a WYSIWYG tool to make easily any possible layout dynamically

mygif_alt
Meenu Says, in 7-10-2005 at 16:10:34 from 203.101.53.213    

I do not believe that the design of the Content Entry Screens is not considered. I have been involved in projects where we can extensively build Content Entry screens , complete with work flow, preview and content publishing and expiry features, access control.
I believe the problem is whether consulting companues need to take into account this when providing solutions. Becos this is a very important aspect, but given the least importance becos the user community is internal.

mygif
pranshu Says, in 7-18-2005 at 02:38:31 from 62.64.227.74    

Usability of content entry screens is always a tough call. Making things easier and more automated is either too much work or ties the content entry screens too tight to the current UI design , or both. However a lot can be done none-the-less.
I subscribe to the philosophy of microsoft word being the example to follow - where newbees can use context menu while the experts can use the keyboard shortcuts. So I find nothing wrong with easy to use pre-built templates and tough to construct custom templates.The problem usually is the need to force content to fit print media or a design which looks like that - page breaks / limited real estate and all.
So can we really seperate content from presentation ? I am not too sure about that. The whole concept of sub-editing and mutiple versions of stories will remain. Language is after all a complex thing.
Unfortunately search in the CMS also becomes the weak link as free text searches on database tend to be too expensive or too slow limiting the usability.

mygif_alt
Alok Jain Says, in 11-8-2005 at 02:16:03 from 138.220.55.197    

I think the view is correct but a bit oversimplistic, the solutions of usability are to be done in business context. If out of box capabilities offer business advantage for e.g. a large organization decides to implement WPS (Websphere Portal Server). WPS comes with in out of box capabilities, which are tied to software support and upgrades by IBM. If one does custom development, it costs money (immediate and long term). time to market is another key factor.

This investment has to be compared against benefits and organization priorities.

#2, the look and feel can still be standardized across these products to a great degree. Most offer CSS control. There is a lot that can be achieved with CSS and JavaScript itself.

This in no way means Usbaility is not important, but it is a meant for a business solution, as long as it work in that context, it’ll be successful and deliver results.

Cheers
Alok

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Inform me when someone post new message here

Please Note: Comments Moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment

Recent Posts

Ads