15 Responsed To This Post
Subsribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL
mygif_alt
Jonathan Says, in 7-30-2005 at 07:28:52 from 64.30.116.64    

OpenCMS is waaay too complicated for what it is. I’m not a fan, and I doubt very many people who actually tried a real-world implementation would be. Sure does a lot of stuff on paper however. Documentation is ok, but hard to get started with (as you said), and customization is difficult.

Lenya is cool, but not really for everybody. It has all the components that make it cool, but I didn’t find using it to be all that.

Alfresco. Talk about beta! You can’t even render the frontend — that’s coming soon. Looks interesting, but very young.

I’ve used Magnolia, and it looks interesting. Magnolia.info — it didn’t make your list!

mygif
Apoorv Says, in 7-30-2005 at 10:09:11 from 59.92.143.128    

Thanks Jonathan. I’ve never had an opprotunity to work with Magnolia but downloaded it just yesterday. Will try and evaluate it soon. But i completely agree with your comments above.

mygif_alt
Javed Says, in 8-2-2005 at 10:48:09 from 71.208.35.32    

Magnolia is selling a basic version and paid “power pack version”, which has all the cool features like clustering and stuff. Why I would go for a basic when I don’t know when I will need features like clustering.

Javed

mygif
Jason Says, in 11-4-2005 at 00:35:21 from 66.130.136.171    

This is a late comment, but if you haven’t checked it out, InfoGlue (www.infoglue.org) is worth looking into. After watching their intro video, I found it to be quite natural to use. Templating is handled by Velocity.

There are some weaknesses - I don’t think it would lend itself well to file management, but I would consider it for development of a corporate site for instance.

A real favorite of mine that I simply can’t use because of the underlying framework is the .NET project, Umbraco (www.umbraco.org). Extremely nice interface and one of the most flexible, smarly built CMSs I’ve seen. All the big features are there. Again, it would be weak as a document repository.

I’ve enjoyed reading your posts - nice (and relevant) work!

mygif_alt
Apoorv Says, in 11-4-2005 at 13:03:52 from 59.92.140.48    

Jason,
Thanks. I’m glad you like the posts.
InfoGlue is in my Radar now :) It looks promising though. Version 2.0 is JSR-168 compliant. If that means I can access all CMS services as portlets, I guess it would be the first CMS to do this.

/a

mygif
Samrat Says, in 11-7-2005 at 19:14:54 from 213.39.225.159    

Hi Apoorv,

I was just wondering if you had evaluated Magnolia? In the last few days i have been comparing a few CMSs and finally narrowed down to Magnolia, openCMS, InfoGlue, Alfresco(in the order of importance). We just need a Web CMS and we would not need any document management features. However, another interesting requirement in our case is that we must have a facility to extend the CMS and define our own custom data-structures which could be mapped on to our custom tables.

Do you have any suggestions?

Have been following your updates on the various java-based open CMSs. Its helping a lot…keep up the good work!

-Samrat

mygif_alt
Apoorv Says, in 11-8-2005 at 17:05:33 from 203.91.193.5    

I’ve never had a chance to work with Magnolia and Infoglue but from what I hear, It takes too much memory just to get it up and running, unlike other Open Source products. However, if JSR-170 is your requirement than Magnolia could be a good choice. Infact there are quite a few people who like this product.
Alfresco recently released its version 1.0 finally. It is still evolving and I’m not sure if it is production ready yet. I could be wrong also though.

One interesting feature of OpenCMS 6.0 is the ability to create your own data types using XMLContent. Basically, you create a simple XML with details of fields in your datastructure and it does rest of the work. However, it stores content in its own VFS in XML format and I’m not sure if it is possible (or a good idea) to map this content to your custom table.

mygif
Samrat Says, in 11-13-2005 at 03:55:39 from 172.178.66.217    

Thank you apoorv! I will look into the XMLContent feature.

I dint get much time in the last week to try out the CMSs. Next week, am planning to evaluate both openCMS and Magnolia at more deeper level to see which one can be easily customizable. Until now, i am a little inclined towards openCMS since there is a possibility to write our own modules, which AFAIK is not the case with Magnolia (please correct me if i am wrong!).

Will write my results here next weekend…

mygif_alt
Florent Says, in 1-5-2006 at 12:41:32 from 195.101.38.93    

And what about eXo Platform ?
http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/exoplatform/
Portal, CMS, DM, …

mygif
adriano Says, in 2-28-2006 at 01:40:26 from 80.180.136.85    

If you are looking for a CMS that allow to build your own
data structure mapped on database tables,
have a look at aplaws+.
http://www.aplaws.org.uk/home/index.php

mygif_alt
mikel Says, in 7-18-2006 at 19:12:34 from 213.133.51.241    

Did someone look at Hippo CMS?
http://www.hippocms.org

Or Daisy
http://cocoondev.org/daisy/index.html

They are also based on Apache Cocoon. The smae as Lenya, but do you know what’s the difference?

mygif
Boris Says, in 11-30-2006 at 18:23:29 from 213.173.174.10    

A small comment to memory requirements of Magnolia
Yes there was a time when Magnolia needed lots of memory for INITIAL startup (i.e. for the very first time you ever staarted Magnolia). This as used for populating the repositories by reading bootstrap files, something that makes it easy for us to be able to plug in other repositories or use different databases.

However, Magnolia has always been rather memory efficient to run. When you download Magnolia today, the initial bootstrap has been performed by us (that makes the download bigger but means you have no big memory requirements anymore).

In other words, we have had systems with 8 Million hits per hour on a standard PC server; and you can run Magnolia with 256MB in general (large sites might need more).

Of course its also a matter of which infrastructure you are using. Websphere? JBoss? Tomcat? Jetty? Resin? Weblogic?

Or do you want to use Liferay or JBoss portal with Magnolia? Thats also possible, and will need much more memory than Magnolia.

mygif_alt
NP Says, in 6-24-2007 at 01:07:35 from 122.164.23.52    

Has anybody looked at MMBase.. It’s a Netherlands based product - and has some cool core features. Completely OO and java based.

mygif
pal Says, in 11-12-2007 at 15:17:31 from 212.161.126.6    

Hi everybody,

I got confused with the world of portals and cms.

Which java based portal/cms would be better for creating easy to customize and dynamic website?

Any experiences Please Share…

mygif_alt
open source cms Says, in 12-2-2007 at 14:36:41 from 83.142.125.122    

Looks great :) But I like php ;)

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Inform me when someone post new message here

Please Note: Comments Moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment

Recent Posts

Ads