<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshoring in ECM context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apoorv.info/2006/02/04/offshoring-in-ecm-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apoorv.info/2006/02/04/offshoring-in-ecm-context/</link>
	<description>Random Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aditya</title>
		<link>http://www.apoorv.info/2006/02/04/offshoring-in-ecm-context/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apoorv.info/?p=90#comment-118</guid>
		<description>who are the  players other than Wipro &amp; Infy
no major news from others
and do you see a bigger  move to offshoring of ECM work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who are the  players other than Wipro &amp; Infy<br />
no major news from others<br />
and do you see a bigger  move to offshoring of ECM work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starbucks</title>
		<link>http://www.apoorv.info/2006/02/04/offshoring-in-ecm-context/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>starbucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apoorv.info/?p=90#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Two competing vendors working from each other&#039;s premises won&#039;t work but there a lot of instances where they work together in neutral territory (i.e. customer premises). It may not be bad after all as each vendor will ensure that their part works well and the hand-offs are clean - so there is a smooth running system. It needs to be well managed by the customer to ensure that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two competing vendors working from each other&#8217;s premises won&#8217;t work but there a lot of instances where they work together in neutral territory (i.e. customer premises). It may not be bad after all as each vendor will ensure that their part works well and the hand-offs are clean &#8211; so there is a smooth running system. It needs to be well managed by the customer to ensure that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
